Parental Rights Under Assault In Education

A seminal cultural issue is the tug-of-war over parental rights and children's education. Increasingly parents are demanding more involvement in what's taught in schools. School districts are pushing back, contending they know what's best for students. Parental rights stop at the school's front door.  

A high-stakes battle over the issue has reached the nation's highest court.  The case involves Maryland parents pitted against the Montgomery County Board of Education.  Parents sued the district over LGBTQ themed books for pre-Kindergarten and elementary-aged children. 

The Supreme Court is expected to hand down a decision in the case this summer.  The suit has reignited the simmering battle over school books, curriculum and teachers classroom guides. Many school boards and the teachers union have erected roadblocks to parental oversight of their child's education. 

At issue in the Maryland case, is the Montgomery County Board of Education's refusal to allow parents to opt out classes that use books with LGBTQ themes in elementary school.  Montgomery County is the 14th largest district in the nation with more than 160,000 students, including 70,000 elementary kids. 

In 2022, Maryland's largest district announced revisions to its curriculum would include new storybooks with young LGBTQ characters to foster diversity and inclusion.  Parents decided to take the issue to court in 2023 after the district refused to honor opt-out requests for students after saying it would.  

Maryland has a law as many states do that requires parental notification and the ability to opt-out of sexual education classes and controversial readings on related topics. The board's own guidelines guarantee parents may seek opt-outs and alternative assignments.  

The board reversed course when a vocal group of parents protested that the opt-out amounted to a violation of their First Amendment rights. Three families took issue with the powerful board, arguing the books subject matter infringed on their free exercise of religion. 

It's worth noting that the opposition group included members of the Catholic, Muslim and Ukrainian Orthodox churches.  They did not challenge the curriculum or demand the school district stop reading the books to other students.  All they asked was the right to have their children excused from the class.

The media has tried to frame this as book banning.  That is patently untrue. Others have contended that religious beliefs don't belong in public schools. But the parents are not lobbying to teach a religious point of view on LGBTQ.  They just don't want their kids exposed to gender affirming messages.

A Montgomery County district board member defended their decision by claiming if books "offend your family's religious values or your core beliefs is just telling (your) kid, 'Here's another reason to hate another person.'"  That irrational judgment reflects the board's contempt for parents. 

Parents should not be asked to surrender their right to instill religious upbringing for their children. Issues surrounding family life and human sexuality are at the heart of many religions teachings. Parents are the best guides on these matters, especially at the elementary and pre-K level. 

It helps to know the content of the richly illustrated books to understand the parents' position. The books, read to pre-K and elementary school-age children, champion pride parades, gender transitioning and pronoun preferences for children.  

As one example, a book tasks three-and-four-year olds to search for images from a word list that includes "intersex flag," "drag queen," leather and the name of a celebrated LGBTQ activist and sex worker. Teaching guides suggest it is "hurtful" if students question these ideas.

The books included "My Rainbow," about a mother who makes a rainbow colored wig for her transgender daughter. Another, "Love Violet," tells the story of a girl who develops a crush on her female classmate Mira. Only Mira made "Violet's heart skip," the book emphasizes. 

One book describes the story of a girl attending her uncle's same-sex wedding. Another, innocently named "Puppy Pride," tells the story of a dog that gets lost during a pride parade.  The deceptively disguised LGBTQ ideology unfolds on the pages. 

The books were front and center when the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in April.  The case landed at the high court after the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the parents of children enrolled in Montgomery County public schools had no right to be notified or opt-out their kids.

The high court has an opportunity to ratify parental rights and religious freedom in its decision.  In addition, the justices should make it clear that parents--not the state or school district--should have the right to decide when to introduce their children to sensitive issues about gender and sexuality.

Federal Taxes: Debunking The Democrat Narrative

Political theater is hogging the spotlight as Congress grapples with the issue of federal income taxes. The actors in Washington are repeating familiar lines.  Tax cuts benefit the oligarchs and billionaires. The wealthy don't pay their fair share. The tax burden falls on the shoulders of the little guy.

Leading roles are being played by Sen. Bernie Sanders and Rep. Alexander Ocasio-Cortez. The Democrat duo are barnstorming the hinterland braying about a "government of the billionaires, by the billionaires and for the billionaires."  The rich are to be scorned and their earnings confiscated. 

The truth is without millionaires and billionaires the federal government would run out of money.  But class warfare has always been viewed by Democrats as a winning political strategy.  Personal success is permissive as along as your income doesn't cross the border into seven figures. 

Taxes are on center stage because of the impending expiration of key provisions of President Trump's 2017 Tax cuts and Jobs Act. Republicans are pushing legislation to make the current taxes permanent, while Democrats are characterizing the package as a pay off to the wealthiest.

Facts are stubborn reminders of the progressive nature of America's tax code.  The more money you make, the federal government takes a larger share of your income.  The 2017 legislation reduced taxes for most Americans, including those in the top 1% of the income bracket.

What Democrats and their media allies are loath to admit is the Trump tax cuts benefited most those in three of the bottom four income brackets. Included are Americans who earn $12,250, $49,750 and $106,000.  Raising their tax rates would hurt the middle class. 

If the current tax cuts are not renewed and rates revert to 2016 levels, 62 percent of tax filers would experience increases in their personal income taxes in 2026. 

Those who rail about reductions in taxes for high earners ignore history's lesson.  Even as taxes have been reduced for the top tax bracket, their share of the income tax burden has grown.  Conversely, the bottom half of earners share of the tax burden has sharply declined. Those are indisputable facts.

In 1980 the top marginal rate was 70% for the wealthiest 1%.  They paid 19% of all federal income taxes.  Since then, their share of the tax burden has grown, even as the top marginal rates were lowered.  At the same time, the tax share of the bottom 50% has declined from 7% in 1980 to 2.96% in 2022.

The latest Internal Revenue Service data from 2022, shows the top 1%--those with incomes over $663,164--paid 40.43% of all federal income taxes. The current tax rate is 39.6% for top earners.The top ten percent of taxpayers--those earning $261,591 and above--paid 76% of personal income taxes.

Including the top 25%, the percentage of taxes paid reaches 89%.  The IRS collected 97% of all personal income taxes from the top 50%. Of the 161.3 million returns filed for the tax year 2022, a total of 50.7 million individuals paid no federal income tax.  

Liberals are quick to point out that taxpayers whose income are in the bottom 50% pay more in payroll taxes than income taxes.  Employers collect these taxes from wages and pay the money directly to the IRS. Payroll taxes fund Social Security and Medicare. 

But that doesn't change the fact that the top 1% paid $855 billion dollars in personal income taxes in 2022, by far the largest share of any marginal tax rate group.  The wealthiest earned 22.4% of all the personal income yet paid nearly twice that percentage in taxes: 40.43%.

Tax fairness depends on your definition of what is equitable.  For historical perspective, the highest marginal tax rate was 94% during 1944.  From 1945 until 1963, it was 91%. By 1964, the rate fell to 77%. For the tax years 1991-1992, the rate dipped to 31%.  

Throughout those years, the top earners always paid the lion's share of taxes to Uncle Sam. 

The Trump tax cuts also lowered the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%.  Reverting to the higher rate would risk increasing inflation. Consumers ultimately pay corporate taxes.  Firms price their goods and services based on all their costs, including taxes.  Demagoguery doesn't change that fact. 

America does not have a revenue problem.  Spending is the chief issue. In the fiscal years of 2020-2024, the federal government spent $38.35 trillion. The gusher created a deficit chasm of $10.78 trillion over the same period. The national debt has ballooned to $36.22 trillion and counting. 

But even a suggestion of budget cuts triggers caterwauling throughout the halls of Congress.  People will go hungry if a smidgen is sliced from the federal government's budget.  But unless the federal budget growth is halted, taxes will need to be raised every year to avoid runaway deficits.

As the Washington drama unfolds, ignore the rhetoric.  This play acting is all about politics.  Democrats want to wreck the Trump presidency by raising taxes which will sink consumer confidence and rattle the  economy.  Winning the midterms is the goal without regard to costs to American household budgets.    

Unhinged Left Unleashes Attacks On Tesla

A hate fueled campaign targeting Elon Musk has turned violent.  The well-funded effort has rapidly escalated across at least 11 states.  Thugs have torched Tesla cars and trucks. Fired shots at dealerships. Vandalized Tesla charging stations.  Spray painted threatening signs: "Kill Elon."

The perpetrators have keyed Tesla cars in parking lots and garages. Spray painted swastikas, a symbol of Nazi Germany, on owners' cars. Tossed Molotov cocktails at parked cars.  Defaced cars and trucks with "f-Musk" in black paint.  The swarm of attacks appear to be more than just random acts.

A shadowy website called "Dogequest" has posted personal information of Tesla owners.  The dark site includes the names, addresses, phone numbers and email addresses of Tesla drivers. The anonymous creators claim they will remove the data when owners prove they have sold their Teslas.

The site has also posted personal information on employees of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).  Musk confirmed publicly that most DOGE employees have received death threats. This is not a peaceful form of protest, despite what activists assert.   

The dishonest media also has painted a target on Tesla with disparaging coverage. In the latest example, the Financial Times posted a story accusing Tesla of financial shenanigans, claiming it identified $1.4 billion in missing funds.  Days after the story tanked Tesla stock, the Times admitted it was untrue.

The politically charged backlash is driven by Musk's leadership of an effort to cut waste, fraud and abuse at the federal government at the direction of President Trump. Democrats, desperate for an issue, have made Musk a lightning rod for their often incendiary language about DOGE. 

Less than a year ago, Musk was a darling of Democrats and the left.  The electric car pioneer exemplified the drive to save the climate by making gasoline powered vehicles obsolete.  Democrats celebrated Musk for his financial support of the party's candidates, including Joe Biden in 2020.

Now Democrats and leftwing activist groups have made it their mission to financially destroy Elon and Tesla. Predictably, the rhetorical signaling has lent a sheen of virtue to the blitzkrieg of destruction. Attorney General Pam Bondi has labeled the violence "domestic terrorism," an apt description.  

Several perpetrators have been charged, but the combustible forces of vengeance and unhinged anger are showing no signs of abetting.  Arrests and prosecutions are welcome, however, the Department of Justice needs to follow the money funneled to organizations agitating the aggression against Tesla.

The money trail starts with a familiar Democrat billionaire: George Soros.  His Open Society Foundation has given $7.6 million to a group known as Indivisible Project.  The leftwing group also received $2 million from the Sandler Foundation, which funds the news platform ProPublica. 

From the Indivisible Project website in bold red letters: "Donald Trump and Elon Musk think this country belongs to them. We're taking to the streets nationwide to fight back with a clear message: HANDS OFF." Included on the site are signs reading: "GTFO Musk" and "Fire Elon Musk."

Indivisible Project is allied with Democratic Socialists of America, which is also backing protests against Musk. The group claims 78,000 members and has been a leading proponent of anti-israel protests.  The organization supports far-left Democrats, including Rep. Rashida Tlaib.

Ironically, a group which provides support for climate change protests is behind the effort against Musk.  Philadelphia-based Disruption Project urges anti-Musk opponents to: "Sell your Teslas.  Dump Your Stock."  On its website, it offers suggestions on how to support Gaza.  

Another leftwing activist group Action Network has aided Disruption Project and other groups to organize the "Tesla Takedown." Action Network brags it helped raise $70 million for Kamala Harris. The organization also donated $13 million to Harris, according to OpenSecrets.  

Action Network, headquartered in Washington D.C., has a fund raising arm that collects money for other activist groups.  The organization also helps like-minded groups set up a website.  In the past, it has hosted a site for the Communist Party and the Young Communist League.  

A joint effort by Action Network and Disruption Project was responsible for listing the addresses of Tesla dealerships for protestors to target. Disruption Project collects donations for its activities through Action Network, founded by a former vice president for the Service Employees International Union. 

Seattle-based environmental organization Troublemakers collects funds through Action Network as well.  Troublemakers has been involved in the "Tesla Takedown" protests at Tesla dealerships.  It's no coincidence that four Tesla Cybertrucks were torched and a car set ablaze in Seattle.  

These activists groups hide behind disclaimers professing they eschew violence.  However, they don't explicitly condemn it either.  The DOJ must hold these leftish organizations and their funders accountable for ginning up hatred that stirs anti-Musk adherents to commit violence.  

Dismantling Department of Failing Education

The Department of Education is failing America's 49 million public school children.  By its own standards, it has a dismal record of elevating student achievement.  Test scores for students have cratered to their lowest level in decades, despite billions of dollars in federal spending.

The latest figures show that federal, state and local spending on K-12 education reached $878.2 billion. That represents 6.1% of the nation's Gross Domestic product (GDP).  Except for tiny Luxembourg, the United States spends the highest percentage of GDP on elementary and secondary education. 

The Department of Education contributed $79 billion for K-12 education in the states in the 2024-2025 government budget cycle.  That represents 13.6% of the total funding. Many Americans might be surprised at the low percentage, given the agency's powerful influence over our children's education.

Congress allocated the agency a total budget of $238 billion in the latest rounding of funding. Lawmakers allotted an additional $190 billion to schools for tutoring and other interventions aimed at recouping the learning loss after in-person learning was suspended during COVID.  

Test scores from the most recent "Nation's Report Card" offer no evidence billions of dollars improved learning. Reading scores on the 2024 National Assessment of Educational Progress fell two points on average for fourth and eighth graders, marking a steady decline that predates the pandemic. 

In math, eighth grade scores were unchanged from 2022, the last time the test was given.  Fourth graders scores ticked up two points, but remained below their performance in 2019.  The gap between lowest and highest performing students widened in the test scores.

The scores don't tell the whole story.  More eight graders than ever before are testing below the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) group's lowest benchmark for reading.  One-third of eighth graders are below the "lowest" standard while 40% of fourth graders fall below the minimum. 

Internationally, 15-year old U.S. high school students rank 26th in math; 20th in reading; and 23rd in science.  The rankings were compiled by the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) in 2023, the latest year for which the data is available. 

The distressing test scores are partially a reflection of the ineffectiveness of the gusher of billions in COVID school funds. Education watchdogs found numerous cases of waste and abuse, according to testimony before a house subcommittee in 2024. 

Among the abuses: Funds were used to install Astroturf on a football field; purchase an ice cream truck; expand a nature center that belonged to a city; host a annual teachers conference in Las Vegas; and millions on internet service that was never launched.  The department's oversight was MIA. 

These failures underscore the unassailable fact: The Department of Education is a misnomer. It educates no children. It is a bureaucracy that serves as a middleman, dispatching our taxpayer dollars to states without adding value, while piling on burdensome complexity and onerous overregulation.   

                                            HISTORY  

The Department of Education traces its lineage to President Andrew Johnson who created the agency in 1867.  Two years later it was moved to the Department of the Interior. During the next 100 years, it was shuttled between agencies before landing in the Department of Health, Education and Welfare. 

The modern day department was birthed for a political calculation. President Jimmy Carter promised a cabinet level education department in his 1976 presidential campaign to win the support of the teacher's union (National Education Association). The union contributed to his campaign and turned out voters.

In 1979, Congress passed legislation which Carter signed into law. Lawmakers allocated $14 billion for the department's first budget. Over the years the department's mission morphed. Today the department lists its goal as to "promote student achievement and preparation for global competitiveness."  

Like many Washington agencies, the department has strayed far afield from its mission and increased its  authority to micromanage education. Congress writes a check for the department to meet its obligations and then lathers on discretionary dollars that allow the agency a wide berth in spending.

Under President George Bush, lawmakers ushered in the "no Child Left Behind" mandate that subjected schools to sanctions if students did not make yearly progress.  Every school that accepted any federal education tax dollars became accountable to Washington bureaucrats.

Test scores took precedent over everything.  Many public schools cut nonessential classes such as art, music and even physical education.  It was a disastrous experiment that lead to cheating by some schools to get a passing grade.  That should have ended the notion Washington could manage education.

However, during the Obama Administration it created "The Race to the Top," with a $100 billion budget to improve learning results. The agency created an open competition for funding, with the money being parceled out to schools with the most elaborate and creative proposals. Test scores failed to improve. 

Since 1979, the department has spent nearly $1 trillion in pursuit of its goal to boost learning with little to show for it.  The department's real customers--students--are the forgotten pawns in this taxpayer funded shell game.  

                                          THE FUTURE

It is time to acknowledge K-12 education is best left to the states. Education was never envisioned by the Constitution's framers as a federal responsibility.  States have their own Departments of Education, school districts, local school boards and funding.  

Not surprisingly, the legacy media and Democrats are throwing up roadblocks, claiming the nation's education system will be irreparably harmed if the agency loses its unchecked authority to deliver money. The feds attach strings to leverage taxpayer dollars, often including social agenda mandates.  

The predictable fear mongering is aimed at protecting the teachers union, which counts on the agency to do its bidding.  As just one example, the union lobbied Congress for the COVID funding, then worked with big city school districts to reward its members with pay increases and signing bonuses. 

As far as federal funding, the money should be transferred via block grants to the states.  One example is  money for special education, including counseling, therapy and transportation. Likewise, taxpayer dollars for research are fungible and can be sent to states, particularly for research on disability issues.

A New York Times article worried that employees responsible for the national report card on education would be lost in a downsizing. This is another red herring because many states already conduct their own surveys to assess student learning.  If a national survey is needed, turn it over to the Census Bureau.

The department's role in higher education is primarily administering federal student aid programs while managing the bloated $1.6 trillion student loan program.  It also oversees the accreditation process for colleges, investigates civil rights violations and collects education data.

The department's investigations into alleged civil rights violations at schools can be moved to the Department of Justice, which already is charged with enforcement.   The student loan program, overseen by the agency, rightly belongs in the Treasury Department.

What the nation can do without is the department's penchant for using taxpayer dollars to push for transgender men in women's athletics and funding of diversity, equity and inclusion in colleges.  Social issues only matter in the faculty lounges of elite universities, but contribute zero to learning.

The fact is states have the strongest incentive for improving education at the elementary, secondary and collegiate level.   

The competition for new businesses is fierce between the states.  States with the highest literacy rates and most proficient schools attract new industry and jobs.  Businesses in turn provide additional funding for public schools. Failing schools will hamper states economic growth and prosperity.

Additionally, educated young people are also less likely to live in poverty; more likely to get a job; less likely to end up in the prison system; more likely to earn higher income; more likely to improve their health outcomes and more likely to be active in their community. 

The viable long-term solution to revitalize education in America is to bring accountability for delivering academic results closer to the parents, teachers and local school boards.  Each state has unique schooling challenges which do not fit the cookie-cutter approach of Washington. 

Leave it to the states and local school boards to decide curriculum, performance standards, allocation of funds, teacher hiring and training standards, graduation requirements and long range planning. They know what's best for their children--not the 4,400 agency employees cloistered in Washington.    

DOGE is A 104-Year-Old Idea

Those squawking about efforts to root out government waste, fraud and abuse act as if it's a dangerous, new concept.  They obviously haven't been paying attention.  The Budget & Accounting Act of 1921 birthed the Government Accounting Office, which was DOGE before Elon Musk rode into Washington. 

The GAO is a non-partisan congressional watchdog overseeing how the federal government operates and spends taxpayers money.  The 104-year-old agency, renamed the Government Accountability Office in 2004, has recommended thousands of ways to save billions of dollars during its long history.

This little known agency has examined every nook and cranny of the federal government from Social Security, to the Department of Defense weapons systems, to Medicaid, foreign aid, cybersecurity, Internal Revenue Service, to Health and Human Services and federal disaster programs. 

The agency's reports are circulated to Congress, often detailing waste, potential fraud and efficiency improvements. On occasion, their findings are used by lawmakers to highlight the government's shortcomings in Congressional hearings.  Sometimes the agency work receives muted news coverage.

But there's one problem.  Federal agencies cited in the GAO's reports more often than not equivocate in adopting changes to address glaring weaknesses.  Unlike Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, the GAO does not have authority to force federal agencies to cut waste or implement findings.

An examination of selective reports by this writer found an alarming number of instances where agencies made little progress, despite calls to implement cost savings, modernize outdated systems, manage fraud risks, address human resource violations and harden cybersecurity protection.

To underscore the recalcitrance, the GAO in February catalogued 4,387 recommendations it had made since 2010, but noted that 764 had not been fully implemented five years later. Of the 1,881suggestions involving so-called, "high-risk" areas, 463 have not been completed as of this year.  

Translation: the government bureaucracy resists warnings and suggestions for improvement.   

In some cases, the GAO's reports have served as a road map for DOGE to inspect deficiencies.  For instance, agency reports in 2023 and 2024 pointed out that "fraud poses a significant risk" at the USAID (United States Agency for International Development.). 

In its letter to the agency, GAO used unsparing language: "Our first priority recommendation calls for agency guidance to require regular fraud risk assessments for USAID programs and documentation of program-specific fraud risk profiles.." 

Sure enough, DOGE ferreted out USAID funds that ended up funding Al Qaeda affiliated fighters in Syria and supporting poppy production in Afghanistan, benefiting the Taliban.  Two Hamas linked groups were on the receiving end of USAID funding funneled through a third party.

After the hurricane and fire damage devastated many cities, it came as no surprise to the GAO that residents were unsatisfied with the federal government response. The GAO offered this blistering assessment of the federal approach in its 2025 report:

"...disaster recovery is fragmented across 30 federal entities.  So many entities involved with multiple programs and authorities, differing requirements and timeframes, and limited data sharing across entities could make it harder for survivors and communities to navigate federal programs."

Translation: There should be a consolidation of agencies and responsibilities to improve efforts to get aid faster to Americans who need it. 

When Musk called for the return of government workers to their offices, it was greeted with cries of outrage from politicians and unions.  But not one media organization pointed out that the GAO had identified the cost to American taxpayers of maintaining empty buildings.

In a report, the GAO underscored annual maintenance and operating costs for the 277,000 government buildings was $10.3 billion in 2023. The agency calculated that with the wholesale adoption of telework, deferred maintenance and underutilization costs totaled $370 billion in 2024.

That's chump change for your federal government. Since 2002, the GAO wrote that federal agencies have reported about $2.8 TRILLION in estimated improper payments, including over $150 billion government-wide in each of the last seven years.

Now you know why there was so much push back when Musk wanted to review federal payment data.

DOGE and its champion Musk will eventually fade into history.  If government worked the way our Constitutional framers intended, lawmakers would grab the reins and hold federal agencies accountable. Unfortunately, they often have been doing just the opposite: feeding the unaccountable beast.

The GAO, with a workforce of 3,100, has demonstrated its chops for uncovering waste and inefficiency. But it lacks teeth to force change. Congress should consider legislating authority for the GAO to compel departments to comply in a timely manner with its recommendations or risk budget and force cuts. 

Without drastic changes, 100 years from now another Elon Musk will be needed to take a chainsaw to the federal bureaucracy. 

Egg Prices Are Nothing to Yolk About

Egg prices are the center or yolk of the latest political ruckus. Democrats are egging on President Trump to lower the cost of a carton of a dozen Grade A large eggs as prices, adjusted for inflation, reached a 45-year high this week.  Democrat surrogates have flocked to social media to hen peck at the issue.

"I had to dip into my 401K to buy a carton of eggs," one woman posted. Another said: "Instead of cutting the government, cut egg prices." Others clucked: "The Powerball is up to 4 dozen eggs." "Broke an egg this morning.  My insurance company is sending an adjuster."  

You get the drift.  Donald Trump has single handedly jacked up egg prices to pay off his billionaire cronies. This is what passes as Washington political theater.  Twenty-one Democrat lawmakers dispatched a letter accusing Trump of "largely ignoring" the problem in his first three weeks in office.

The letter demands Trump "lower food prices by encouraging competition and fighting price gouging at each level of the food supply chain." The lawmakers, marshaled by Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren, pledged to work with the president to make eggs a great bargain again.

Democrats are the ones with egg on their faces if they believe Trump is responsible for surging egg prices.  They need to leave their cozy Washington nest and visit chicken farms in America.

Egg prices are skyrocketing because of a nationwide outbreak of avian influenza. The virus occurs naturally among wild aquatic birds (think ducks) worldwide. These migrating birds infect domestic poultry.  The highly contagious influenza spreads quickly among caged chickens. 

Euthanizing flocks is the best option to combat the spread. More than 150 million chickens have been killed in all 50 states to halt the virus since 2022, according to the Department of Agriculture (USDA).This is the largest outbreak in the United States since 2015.  

Even more worrisome, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports there have been bird flu detections in dairy cattle, including cows in Arizona. Although rare, there have been 68 human cases, including one confirmed death. CDC says the source of the human infections is unidentified.

As culling accelerates, egg prices have soared 53% since January of last year.  This past month prices for a carton of Grade A large eggs leapfrogged another 15%.  The national average price for a dozen eggs in January was $4.95.  That eclipses the record set in January 2023, when the price was $4.82.

Although prices are climbing, the demand has not slackened because high-protein eggs are considered a staple in most households. The average American eats 284 eggs a year, an increase from last year's total of 281.  (Per capita consumption is a measure of total egg production divided by the population.) 

There is little relief in sight for the American consumer.  In November, seven million chickens were destroyed. By last December, the number jumped to 18 million and rose to 23 million in January.  Despite the culling of infected chickens, the virus has been advancing like a Bataan Death March.

Most egg-laying farms maintain fewer than 100 chickens, but large producers house upwards of 100,000. Broiler farms, which bred chickens for meat, range in size from 40,000 chickens to more than 500,000. Once infections are detected, the safest course to euthanize the entire flock. 

Eggs Unlimited Vice President Brian Moscogiuri offers this perspective on the egg crisis. "In the last few months alone, since the middle of October, we've lost 45 million egg-laying hens. We've lost a significant amount of production, more than 13%." 

Eggs Unlimited is one of the largest international supplier of eggs. The firm ships eggs to major retailers, distributors and food service companies.  "For consumers, (we're) trying to limit their impact with the pricing and the supply chain shortages we're seeing right now," Moscogirui says.

Just this year about one-in-12 caged hens have been culled. Considering lifecycles, it takes about five months before hens begin laying eggs.  By comparison, chickens raised for meat are ready for slaughter after a month-and-a-half.  

With Easter on the horizon, the demand for eggs likely will shoot up. Some grocery stores are already limiting the number of cartons customers can purchase.  In a sign of the times, earlier this month 100,000 organic eggs worth an estimated $40,000 were stolen from a facility in Pennsylvania.

Consumers best hope are egg farmers. There are 48,952 businesses engaged in chicken egg production, centered in just ten states, accounting for 65% of the egg output. These small and large farms produced about 109 billion eggs in 2023, the latest year for which figures are available.

America's chicken egg-laying farms have dealt with adversity before and managed each time to scramble to restart production.   They will deliver again to  consumers who will no longer have to walk on egg shells when they search for egg cartons at the grocery store. 

Exposing The Troubled History Of The USAID

A storm of controversy swirls over a relatively unknown federal government agency that doles out billions of dollars in taxpayer funds to foreign countries.  New reporting has unearthed reports stretching over years warning about fraud, waste, sexual abuse and funding linked to terrorists.

President Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) ignited the firestorm by uncovering reckless, wasteful spending and a lack of management accountability at the U.S. Agency for International Development.  The president shuttered USAID headquarters, locking out employees.  

USAID Background 

The agency, staffed by more than 10,000 workers, handed out $40 billion in 2023, the last year for which government figures are available. That workforce level does not include contractors.  USAID maintains more than 60 country and regional missions that develop projects to be funded. 

The bureaucracy distributed $42 billion to 130 countries, including Gaza.  In 2022, Congress appropriated an additional $46 billion to be managed partially or wholly by the agency for assistance to Ukraine. Since 2017, the USAID budget has more than doubled. 

An investigation and research by this writer found the troubled agency has a checkered history of a lack of transparency, credibility and a disregard for oversight.  Despite numerous admonishments, USAID continues to operate as if the agency is not answerable to the president or the federal government.

As a recent example, current and former USAID staff revolted when the agency's director Samantha Power voiced support for Israel after the country was attacked by Hamas in October. Many agency employees act as if they are running USAID, accountable only to themselves. 

Raising Red Flags

As far back as 2018, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) and the Inspector General for USAID sounded alarms over the agency's funneling of taxpayer money to outside groups with limited oversight. Not only did the agency ignore the red flags, it doubled down on obfuscation. 

The agency, which boasts it prioritizes diversity, equity and inclusion, gifted United Nations agencies, development banks and foreign-based non-governmental organizations (NGO) with billions to be spread across the globe, including in lawless hotspots, including Sudan, Syria and Haiti. 

These activities, in particular, attracted the attention of the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) and the GAO. The two discovered an appalling lack of oversight by the agency's practice of funneling the money through third parties.  

Here are selected highlights from reports from the Inspector General and the GAO:

• USAID failed to document 519 instances of misconduct for funds transmitted to the UN'S World Food Program.  Instead, the USAID only reported  29 instances of potential misconduct for aid, reflecting non-compliance with the agency's own standards.
• Investigations were hampered by UN agencies to prevent diversion of USAID funds to the terrorist organization Hamas. The OIG also listed its concern that United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRA) employees implicated in the October 7 attack on Israel had infiltrated USAID funded organizations. 
• USAID failed to share with the Inspector General information about UN individuals who have been terminated for criminal and serious misconduct.  In 2023, World Health Organization officials were found to have sexually assaulted women and girls while performing USAID-funded Ebola programs in Africa.
• OIG special agents have encountered resistance from foreign-based NGO's when requesting information about individuals alleged to have perpetuated fraud or engaged in sexual exploitation in running USAID-funded programs.
• A GAO report noted the USAID bureaus and missions lack ability to conduct direct oversight in conflict zones to verify the funds are being used for the intended humanitarian purpose.
• Inspectors found the USAID does not have "quality" data to support its $150 billion climate change initiative.  "Specifically, the data was not complete, accurate, accessible or current" the inspectors found. 
• The OIG ferreted out a scheme by a non-governmental organization in South Africa to bilk USAID out of $671,914 after the group submitted false payment claims to the agency.  The OIG cited other examples of fraudulent claims in its 2025 report, including a $2.02 million payment to an  Norwegian aid group. 
• A GAO analysis of the agency discovered the USAID sent money through a cutout organization that ended up funding China's Wuhan Institute of Virology.  To date, even Congress has been able to determine the amount of the funding. 

In its 2025 report, the OIG concluded that "theft and diversion of cash assistance, food, medicine and other commodities frustrates the intent of the United Sates" while undermining the agency's mission of humanitarian assistance. 

These reports are nonpartisan, authored by federal government employees and agencies.  The information has been available to Congress and the executive branch.  Why has there been no action to address the concerns from either political party?  That is the question no corporate media are asking.

A few in Congress have been aware of USAID's pattern of obstructionism. Iowa Senate Republican Joni Ernst revealed how the agency has been "stonewalling" her office for years as she sought documents detailing aid to businesses in Ukraine.  

USAID claimed the information was classified to deny the senator's requests.  After Ernst demanded to speak to the USAID Office of Security, the agency handed over a few documents. She discovered that 5,000 Ukrainian businesses received awards of up to $2 million each. 

DOGE Findings 

DOGE has exposed hundreds of millions of dollars for dubious USAID directed aid:

• $2 million for sex changes and LGBTQ activism in Guatemala.
• $1.5 million to advance DEI in Serbia's workplaces and business communities.
• $6 million to fund tourism in Egypt.
• $70,000 for production of a DEI musical in Ireland.
• $47,000 for transgender operations in Colombia.
• $2.5 million for electric vehicles in Vietnam.
• $32,000 for a transgender comic book in Peru. 
• $2 million for pottery classes in Morocco. 
• $20 million for a Sesame Street workshop in Iraq to promote "inclusion, mutual respect and understanding across ethnic, religious and sectarian groups."
• $45 million to provide food assistance and economic support for Venezuelan migrants in Columbia. 

This reality stands in stark contrast to the growing legacy media stories that have appeared since the scandal broke. They paint a picture of USAID funding for desperate people in third-world countries in need of food assistance and medicine.  There has been no coverage of the OIG and GAO reports.

The media complicity has given cover for Democrats to spend political energy haranguing unelected "billionaire" Elon Musk for the revelations. The oligarchs are ruling Washington, they shout in defiance. Where's the outrage for USAID's wasteful spending of taxpayers dollars? Crickets. 

Democrats are targeting Musk as the villain because they endorse USAID's funding of social issues.  They are furious Musk exposed the foreign aid boondoggles. 

USAID Defenders 

USAID defenders make the case that the DOGE examples of millions of dollars of waste only amount to a fraction of the agency budget. Excusing a "little" misuse of funds is an example of Washington's hubris. Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren reflects the Democrat Party's attitude:

"There is nothing in the constitution that says ordinary Americans have a right to see what we're spending tax dollars on," she said. Actually, Article 1, Section 9, Clause 7 of the Constitution requires the government to publish regular statements about how taxpayer money is spent.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio has made it clear he intends to fold USAID into the State Department, thus ending the agency's autonomous operation.  The secretary wants to continue foreign aid, but with more oversight and funding supporting the administration's objectives. 

Referencing the USAID, the president said "the American's people's money must be spent to advance their priorities, not line the pockets of contractors or to maintain projects that don't work." Typical Trump, overstatement? No, that quote is from 2009 and the president was Barrack Obama.  

No government agency no matter how noble sounding its name or mission has the right to fritter away taxpayer dollars. By defending the indefensible, Democrats are showing they are out of touch with average Americans who expect efficiency, transparency and accountability in their government.