Showing posts with label Supreme Court. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Supreme Court. Show all posts

Monday, May 9, 2022

Attacks On Supreme Court Are Midterm Strategy

The unethical leak of a draft Supreme Court decision on abortion has unleashed a vicious flurry of attacks orchestrated by the Democratic Party.  The fiery response is fueling rage that threatens to dig deeper divisions in America.  The president who promised to heal the country is nowhere to be found.

Make no mistake that the leak was an egregious act to undermine the court. The court's secrecy is sacrosanct.  In this writer's opinion, a Supreme Court justice likely knew about the leak or perhaps encouraged a clerk to leak the document to intimidate the other justices into changing their opinions.

There is little doubt this calculated deceit also is aimed at propping up the sagging political fortunes of Democratic Party candidates facing midterm electoral carnage. With President Biden's approval ratings below sea level, Democrats desperately needed a Hail Mary pass to level the playing field.

The draft, penned by Justice Samuel Alito, appeared first in Politico which licensed  the media cabal to expose the entire document without criticism. It's an old media trick. Politico takes the heat while the liberal media does a Pontius Pilate, washing its hands of blame. 

Moments after the Politico story broke online, pro-abortion activists were in front of the Supreme Court building, waving perfectly printed signs. This is no coincidence.  It should be obvious the protest was staged by groups that had been tipped off about the Politico bombshell report. 

An activist group funded by dark money, Ruth Sent Us, publicly released the home addresses of conservative court justices and urged supporters to show up at their residences to protest. This is not a protest but an attempt to frighten the families of justices by recklessly invading their privacy.

On its website, Ruth Sent Us issues a call for muralists or chalk artists. The website adds: "Large-scale art will be included in the protests against the Supreme Court. Stipends available." On May 11, the bullies plan to protest at the "homes of the six extremist justices." This is a new level of anarchy.

Ruth Sent Us leaders are acting more like terrorists than activists. The group's recruits jumped the gun and gathered outside justices homes this weekend and urged extremists to harangue Catholic Churches on Mother's Day for the religion's stance on abortion. 

In a social media post , Ruth Sent Us mocked Catholics with this message:

"Stuff your rosaries and your weaponized prayer.  We will remain outraged after this weekend, so keep praying.  We'll be burning the Eucharist to show our disgust for the abuse Catholic Churches have condoned for centuries."  This hate speech was not banned from the social platform. 

Biden apologist Jen Psaki refused to condemn protests at the justices private homes. She said peaceful protests are part of the American experience.  Not a single Democrat raised any objections. In fact, Psaki and the president never criticized the leak.  It's an election year and Democrats need an issue.

The lone Democrat to show any decency was Senator Mark Warner of Virginia who unequivocally denounced the leaking of a draft opinion. Democrat leaders Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer avoided criticizing the leaker, focusing on the draft opinion. Leaking is fine when it helps Democrats.  

Americans deserve some answers. Was the leaker paid?  Did a sitting justice facilitate the leak? How did Politico obtain the copy of the opinion?  It is the public's right to know. But Democrats control all levers of government, so no one will be held accountable. 

At this point, let's review some facts.  A draft opinion is not the final decision.  Drafts are routinely circulated before the court announces its decision publicly.  Secondly, even if the draft reflects the majority, abortion will still be legal in the United States.  Each state will decide any restrictions.

Now Democrats are huffing and puffing about enlarging the Supreme Court and stuffing it will liberal extremists.  (Yes, if Republican-nominated judges are extremists, then Democrats should be judged by this standard.) They are also threatening to unleash a whirlwind against the conservative judges.  

Such heated rhetoric is a tactic to light a fire under Democrat voters, who are less than motivated to show up at the polls for a party that has overseen the highest inflation in 40 years.  Abortion is an inflammatory wedge issue designed to drive more Democrat voters to the polls in the midterms.   

However, a Pew Research poll released May 6 suggests abortion is a nuanced issue with Americans.  Six-in-ten Americans support legal abortion.  However, the survey discovered when asked about abortion at a specific time in the pregnancy the public opinion shifts.

The survey shows 56% of Americans say how long a woman has been pregnant should matter in determining whether abortion should be legal. That includes 52% of Democrats, according to Pew Research, and 64% of Republicans.  

There are so many ironies surrounding the abortion kerfuffle that it is difficult to know where to start.  Ruth Bader Ginsburg, whose name Ruth Sent Us appropriated, actually was not fond of the Roe vs. Wade ruling. On several occasions, she opined that the decision tried to do too much too fast.

"My criticism of Roe is that it seemed to have stopped the momentum on the side of change," she said in a speech at the Chicago Law School.  She called the decision too far-reaching and too sweeping. To be clear, she supported abortion, but not the 1973 decision's approach.

President Joe Biden once advocated outlawing abortion.  In 1981, then Senator Biden championed a Constitutional amendment to allow states to overturn Roe vs. Wade. The bill never made it to the full Senate.  When Biden entered the Senate in 1973, he said the court went "too far" on abortion.

Now President Biden showers abortion with his full-throated backing.

In politics, senators and representatives routinely change their stances on issues about as often as they change their underwear. That's just the ethically-challenged politics of Washington. Both parties are stone cold guilty.  Members follow the prevailing political winds, not their consciences. 

The leak and attendant rancor on both sides will fuel nastier politics. Rage will remain in vogue. In recent years, hordes vandalized statutes.  Rioters terrorized the country for an entire summer, looting, killing and burning buildings.  A uncontrolled mob invaded the Capitol. This is more of the same. 

Many Americans are sick of the political discourse, the division, the hatred, the name-calling and the anarchy.  But if Americans keep voting for the same people and expecting a more civil America they have no one to blame but themselves.  The nation will change when voting reflects American values.  

Monday, February 7, 2022

SCOTUS Nominations Stir Political Histrionics

The circus is coming to Washington.  Feats of political daring and contrived theatrics will unfold under the Capitol dome instead of a big tent.  It will be entertaining for the political class inside the Beltway. But for most Americans, the Senate confirmation of a Supreme Court justice is unwatchable absurdity.

Once upon a time, presidential appointments of Supreme Court justices was a civil process.  From 1789 until 1965, every nomination by a sitting U.S. president was ratified by a voice vote.  The last justice to receive this cordial treatment was President Lyndon Johnson's appointment of Abe Fortas 57 years ago.

Since the nomination of Clarence Thomas by George H.W. Bush in 1991, the Senate has turned what once was a dignified process into a farce. Justice Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh in 2018 were blindsided in the hearings by dubious sexual allegations.  Justice Kavanaugh was nominated by President Trump.

Amy Coney Barrett, another Trump appointee, was hectored by Democrat Senator Diane Feinstein over her Catholic faith.  Senate Democrats successfully filibustered the Trump nomination of Neil Gorsuch, hoping to sink the Supreme Court candidate.  What happened next, flabbergasted Democrats. 

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell invoked the so-called nuclear option to pave the way for approval of the nominee on a simple majority vote.  McConnell reminded critics it was former Democrat Senate Leader Harry Reid who broke tradition and pushed the nuclear button in 2013.

Those nominations cited above were approved by razor-thin margins along party lines. Compare their treatment to recent nominees by Presidents Obama and Clinton. Stephen Breyer and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Clinton nominees, were approved by bipartisan votes of 87-9 and 96-3, respectively.

Obama nominees Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor breezed through confirmation on 63-37 and 68-31 bipartisan majorities.  Can you detect a pattern?  Democrats employ the politics of character assassination to scuttle GOP nominees, while Republicans concede a president's right to appoint a qualified person.

Now the nation is being treated to a new phenomenon.  President Biden pledged during the campaign to name an African-American female to the highest court.  There were no other qualifications mentioned.  He has since justified his injection of race, saying the high court "should look like America." 

That is a sudden about face for Mr. Biden.  Then Senator Joe Biden voted against Clarence Thomas, who was nominated to succeed the lone African-American on the court, Justice Thurgood Marshall.  If Thomas had not been confirmed over Biden's objections, the Supreme Court justices would have been all white.

When President George W. Bush nominated  African-American Janice Rogers Brown to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, Senator Biden opposed the choice.  After Justice Brown won confirmation, her name was later listed as a possible replacement for retiring justice Sandra Day O'Connor. 

Senator Biden signaled he would filibuster the nomination before President Bush even announced his final pick.  This was Senator Biden's opportunity to make Supreme Court "look like America."  How can anyone take him seriously now?  His nominee is political payback and nothing more.

Mr. Biden's commitment to racial preference stems from the primary campaign when his flagging fortunes depended on a win in South Carolina.  Influential South Carolina Democrat Jim Clyburn pledged to deliver a primary victory, in exchange for a black female court appointee.  

That's why Mr. Biden announced he would replace Justice Stephen Breyer with an African-American female.  There was nothing altruistic about his choice.  This was a political calculus by the president to pay the debt he owed to Rep. Clyburn.

Mr. Biden's clumsy announcement, narrowing his field of candidates to black women, has not played well with voters. An ABC News/Ipsos poll this month found 76% of Americans believe the president should consider all possible nominees, rather than limiting the field to a single race.  

If you're wondering whom Mr. Biden will select for the judicial vacancy, put away your Ouija board. Rep. Clyburn has already endorsed South Carolina Federal District Judge J. Michelle Childs. South Carolina Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham has seconded the Clyburn choice.  Case closed.

The hearings may seem like a formality with Democrats holding the majority, however, this will be a matinee worthy of Ringling Brothers. The media has already shown its hand, casting Republican opposition as racist.  Any serious questioning of the nominee will be interpreted as white patriarchy.  

There have been 115 justices who have served on the Supreme Court since it was created in 1789--two black men and five women.  An African-American female on the court would indeed be historic. However, imposing racial, gender or ethnic quotas denigrates the dignity of the nation's highest court.