Showing posts with label George Soros. Show all posts
Showing posts with label George Soros. Show all posts

Monday, March 31, 2025

Unhinged Left Unleashes Attacks On Tesla

A hate fueled campaign targeting Elon Musk has turned violent.  The well-funded effort has rapidly escalated across at least 11 states.  Thugs have torched Tesla cars and trucks. Fired shots at dealerships. Vandalized Tesla charging stations.  Spray painted threatening signs: "Kill Elon."

The perpetrators have keyed Tesla cars in parking lots and garages. Spray painted swastikas, a symbol of Nazi Germany, on owners' cars. Tossed Molotov cocktails at parked cars.  Defaced cars and trucks with "f-Musk" in black paint.  The swarm of attacks appear to be more than just random acts.

A shadowy website called "Dogequest" has posted personal information of Tesla owners.  The dark site includes the names, addresses, phone numbers and email addresses of Tesla drivers. The anonymous creators claim they will remove the data when owners prove they have sold their Teslas.

The site has also posted personal information on employees of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).  Musk confirmed publicly that most DOGE employees have received death threats. This is not a peaceful form of protest, despite what activists assert.   

The dishonest media also has painted a target on Tesla with disparaging coverage. In the latest example, the Financial Times posted a story accusing Tesla of financial shenanigans, claiming it identified $1.4 billion in missing funds.  Days after the story tanked Tesla stock, the Times admitted it was untrue.

The politically charged backlash is driven by Musk's leadership of an effort to cut waste, fraud and abuse at the federal government at the direction of President Trump. Democrats, desperate for an issue, have made Musk a lightning rod for their often incendiary language about DOGE. 

Less than a year ago, Musk was a darling of Democrats and the left.  The electric car pioneer exemplified the drive to save the climate by making gasoline powered vehicles obsolete.  Democrats celebrated Musk for his financial support of the party's candidates, including Joe Biden in 2020.

Now Democrats and leftwing activist groups have made it their mission to financially destroy Elon and Tesla. Predictably, the rhetorical signaling has lent a sheen of virtue to the blitzkrieg of destruction. Attorney General Pam Bondi has labeled the violence "domestic terrorism," an apt description.  

Several perpetrators have been charged, but the combustible forces of vengeance and unhinged anger are showing no signs of abetting.  Arrests and prosecutions are welcome, however, the Department of Justice needs to follow the money funneled to organizations agitating the aggression against Tesla.

The money trail starts with a familiar Democrat billionaire: George Soros.  His Open Society Foundation has given $7.6 million to a group known as Indivisible Project.  The leftwing group also received $2 million from the Sandler Foundation, which funds the news platform ProPublica

From the Indivisible Project website in bold red letters: "Donald Trump and Elon Musk think this country belongs to them. We're taking to the streets nationwide to fight back with a clear message: HANDS OFF." Included on the site are signs reading: "GTFO Musk" and "Fire Elon Musk."

Indivisible Project is allied with Democratic Socialists of America, which is also backing protests against Musk. The group claims 78,000 members and has been a leading proponent of anti-israel protests.  The organization supports far-left Democrats, including Rep. Rashida Tlaib.

Ironically, a group which provides support for climate change protests is behind the effort against Musk.  Philadelphia-based Disruption Project urges anti-Musk opponents to: "Sell your Teslas.  Dump Your Stock."  On its website, it offers suggestions on how to support Gaza.  

Another leftwing activist group Action Network has aided Disruption Project and other groups to organize the "Tesla Takedown." Action Network brags it helped raise $70 million for Kamala Harris. The organization also donated $13 million to Harris, according to OpenSecrets.  

Action Network, headquartered in Washington D.C., has a fund raising arm that collects money for other activist groups.  The organization also helps like-minded groups set up a website.  In the past, it has hosted a site for the Communist Party and the Young Communist League.  

A joint effort by Action Network and Disruption Project was responsible for listing the addresses of Tesla dealerships for protestors to target. Disruption Project collects donations for its activities through Action Network, founded by a former vice president for the Service Employees International Union. 

Seattle-based environmental organization Troublemakers collects funds through Action Network as well.  Troublemakers has been involved in the "Tesla Takedown" protests at Tesla dealerships.  It's no coincidence that four Tesla Cybertrucks were torched and a car set ablaze in Seattle.  

These activists groups hide behind disclaimers professing they eschew violence.  However, they don't explicitly condemn it either.  The DOJ must hold these leftish organizations and their funders accountable for ginning up hatred that stirs anti-Musk adherents to commit violence.  

Monday, April 17, 2023

Trump Indictment: Justice Is Partisan Not Blind

Christmas came early for Democrats with the indictment of former President Donald Trump.  The party's irrational obsession with jailing Trump knows no legal or ethical bounds.  Proof is the feeble case cobbled together by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg.

Most honest legal scholars, liberal pundits and even the left's media darling The New York Times have labeled the case flimsy.  Bragg, who campaigned on prosecuting Trump, fashioned his case on a dubious legal theory. The indictment is littered with prosecutorial holes  and sidesteps the statute of limitations.

Bragg, who owes his election to George Soros, let the case against Trump lay fallow for nearly 18 months before unveiling the 34-count felony indictment. Bragg burnished his Democratic Party political credentials with the first ever criminal prosecution of a former president in the 245-year U.S. history. 

The news media salivated at the prospect of a Trump mug shot.  But they were disappointed after the former president appeared in a Manhattan court to plead not guilty to falsification of business records without ever being photographed in an orange jumpsuit.  

Utah GOP Sen. Mitt Romney, who twice voted to impeach Trump, awkwardly sided with his nemesis. "The prosecutor's overreaction sets a dangerous precedent for criminalizing political opponents and damages the public's faith in our justice system." You have to work hard to make Trump a martyr.

UCLA campaign finance law expert Richard Hasen was quoted in Politico as writing: "In this vein, it is very easy to see this case tossed for legal insufficiency or tied up in courts well past the 2024 election before it might go to trial."

Bragg's prosecution is strictly political. His predecessor, Cyrus Vance, Jr., reviewed Trump's alleged hush-money payments and opted not to indict.  The prosector for the Southern District of New York chose not to pursue the case in 2019.  The Federal Election Commission reviewed the allegations in 2021 and did not take action.

A member of the Manhattan DA office resigned in February, 2022, after Bragg refused to charge Trump with financial crimes.  The attorney, Mark Pomerantz, was championing the investigation into the former president.  Bragg deemed the facts did not support an indictment.

Six years have passed since the underlying conduct alleged in the indictment, exceeding the statute of limitations. More puzzling is how Bragg elevated the "falsification of business records" charges into felonies, a move that required evidence Trump attempted to conceal a second crime. 

Bragg left the question of the second crime dangling without explanation. He  refused to offer specifics.  Instead he promised reporters to reveal "more evidence made available to the office and the opportunity to meet with additional witnesses."   In other words, he has nothing.   

So what changed Bragg's mind about prosecution?  The view here is Bragg was pressured by Democrats to file charges.  The timing of the indictment is suspect.  With the presidential campaign drawing closer, Biden's handlers have made it clear they are frothing over a rematch against Trump.

What better way to hamstring Trump than the public spectacle of an indictment?  The former president already faces the prospect of a host of legal problems.  But those may take months or longer to reach fruition.  Democrat political calculations favored a Bragg action, far removed from Washington.

The Department of Justice is investigating Trump's handling of secret documents. But a DOJ indictment would have smacked of partisanship. Better to have an administration outsider deliver the judicial coup. This charade smacks of a banana-republic style political vendetta.    

Most Americans had never heard of Alvin Bragg until his bombshell indictment.  He was elected Manhattan DA in 2021, riding to victory by outspending his opponents.  Billionaire Soros funneled at least $500,000 to one Bragg's political action committee and donated $1 million for voter turnout. 

Bragg is just one of a bevy of Soros district attorney serfs financed by the Hungarian-born businessman.   Soros has backed candidates who coddle criminals in the name of judicial system reform. It's no coincidence that Soros also was a mega donor to the Biden presidential campaign. 

Bragg has earned the moniker of a soft on crime district attorney. The data backs up that sobriquet. Bragg in 2022 downgraded 52% of the felony cases to misdemeanor, compared to his predecessor's rate of 39%. Even the cases Bragg prosecutes end in not guilty verdicts.

Records show that his office's conviction rate is 17%.  There have been high profile instances of repeat offenders committing felonies after Bragg granted bail. No wonder crime is soaring in Manhattan this year. Crime rates are up 38% in Manhattan South and 17% in Manhattan North. 

Bragg bellowed no one is above the law in justifying the Tump indictment.  In Bragg's Manhattan, some convicted felons receive better treatment than a former president. 

The non-stop, one-sided coverage of the indictment is succor for Democrats.  But using a Manhattan DA as a Trump foil may backfire. Republicans also can find friendly district attorneys willing to bring indictments against Hunter Biden, for instance.

Politically motivated prosecutions of campaign opponents by either party is a bad idea. Anyone who claims to want to preserve democracy should be the first to condemn Bragg's prosecutorial hijinks.   

Monday, June 8, 2020

ANTIFA: Unmasking The Anarchist Movement

"The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral, begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy.  Instead of diminishing evil, it multiplies it."  -- Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.


What began as peaceful protests over the death of an African-American in Minneapolis, quickly turned violent as rioting, looting and arson spread to dozens of cities.  The storm of rage ignited a contentious national conversation about policing, racial justice and property destruction.

Police arrested more than 1,000 rioters and looters nationwide during the wave of violence.  It is difficult if not imprecise to calculate the number of deaths because of lax reporting in many cities.  However, using a search of public news reports, at least 15 deaths have been linked to the riots.

During the melee, at least two police officers were killed, including a retired African-American policeman and a security officer for the Federal Protection Services.  More than 60 Secret Service members and at least 200 New York City policemen have been injured.

The incident that sparked the torrent of protests was the death of George Floyd, a 46-year who died on Memorial Day after police arrested him over a suspected counterfeit $20 bill.  A Minneapolis policeman is charged with kneeling on Floyd's neck, causing the man's death.

While the events surrounding Floyd's death have justifiably received pervasive attention, little has been written about what appears to be a coordinated attempt to hijack the peaceful protests with the intention of promoting widespread mayhem against businesses, police and citizens.

The shadowy, loose-knit, organization Antifa has been under suspicion because of its past involvement in ugly racial confrontations over the last four years.  The anarchist miltia-style movement has made no secret of its aspiration to engage in political street warfare.

However, Antifa is just one of a burgeoning evolution of anarchist groups which have sprung up in the past decade.  While there is little formal affiliation between the organizations, they all embrace an agenda of insurrection, physical confrontation and are virulently anti-law enforcement.

                                                 Anarchist Origins

Antifa, the acronym is a truncation of anti-fascist, traces its roots to the 1960's in Europe when a collection of groups and individuals organized to oppose far right-wing movements.  Their original aim was to counter what it perceived as the German people's failure to oppose Nazism in the 1930's.

By the end of the 1970's, the movement migrated to the U.S. but it remained largely an underground organization with no public presence.  The Rose City Antifa, located in Portland, is the oldest and best known group.  It is no coincidence that Portland has been the scene of some of the worst rioting.

On its Facebook page, Rose City clearly advocates for aggression.  "We are unapologetic about the reality that fighting fascism at points requires physical militancy.  Anti-facism is, by nature, a form of self-defense: the goal of fascism is to exterminate the vast majority of human beings."

Antifa has a website ItsGoingDown.org which promotes its brand of activism.  In previous posts, the website identifies as one of its goals to "build a culture of non-cooperation with law enforcement." The group urges disciples to make the country "ungovernable" through "mass insurrection."

Antifa has left a trail of tumultuous, provocative incidents in is activist wake. An Antifa mob prevented a Manhattan Institute scholar from entering the Claremont McKenna College auditorium for a speech to students, calling her a "fascist, white supremacist and a warhawk."

Her crime?  She had penned books defending police as not racist.

The group was active in cities across the U.S. after protests over the killing of unarmed African-American Michael Brown in Ferguson Missouri in 2014. After a grand jury declined to idict the white police officer who shot Brown, violence erupted in cities from Los Angeles to New York. 

Tracking Antifa's activism is difficult because it is loosely allied with many splinter groups.  Local groups with titles that include the words, "Against Police Brutality", may not be directly linked to Antifa, but embrace its tactics for ongoing confrontation with law enforcement.

Other wannabe organizations that are in the Antifa orbit include Refuse Fascism, created weeks after President Trump's election in 2016.  In Chicago, the Haymaker Anti-Fascist Gym admits it has "passion for insurrection in our fists." Their mission is to stamp out far-right violence.

Of course, the best known of these anarchist groups is Black Lives Matter, formed in 2013 in response to the killing of Trayvon Martin.  The group, which once met with President Obama, has been at the epicenter of racial incidents around the country, including in Ferguson and Baltimore.

The faction claims its mission is to "eradicate white supremacy and build local power to intervene in violence inflicted on Black communities by the state and vigilantes."  In their credo, they state the are working for a world "where Black lives are no longer systematically targeted for demise."

Another anarchist agitator is the New Black Panther Party, which has advocated violence against whites and Jews in particular. They call themselves revolutionaries and usually show up in force whenever there are large protests over police conduct or racial episodes that attract national attention.

Although no evidence was found directly linking the group to the man who gunned down five Dallas police officers in 2016, police discovered his Facebook page was supportive of the New Black Panther Party.  Detectives found bomb-making materials, rifles and ammunition at the killer's home.

There is even a group, known as Tilted Scales Collective, which offers legal assistance to anarchists who are arrested in "social struggles to assist them in navigating their criminal legal charges."  It fights "for political prisoners...and politicized prisoners in the so-called United States."

Not all anarchist groups are on the left. Three men with ties to a loosely organized group of right wing extremists, who advocate the overthrow of the U.S. government, were arrested on terrorism-related charges in Las Vegas.  They were charged with conspiracy to incite violence.

Federal prosecutors stated the three had military experience and were planning to capitalize on protests over the Floyd death.  Once in custody, the men self-identified as members of the "boobaloo" movement, a term used by extremists who are preparing for a coming civil war in the country.

As this analysis demonstrates, there is a large and growing network of so-called anti-fascist groups embedded in the country.  This loose collection of organizations poses a threat to the safety and security of the country, according to Attorney General William Barr.

Barr blamed a "witches brew" of extremist groups, such as Antifa and other anarchists, for exploiting the George Floyd protests.  He has instructed the FBI to open an extensive investigation of this notorious cabal which has as its objective the inciting of violence.

                                            Defunding Police

Out of the flames of fires in major cities wracked by violence, Black Lives Matter has begun petitioning governors, mayors and other anarchist groups to seize the momentum of the national attention on the Floyd murder to defund police departments, a long-standing aim.

"Black communities are living in persistent fear of being killed by state authorities, like the police," an organization spokesperson told reporters.  Money saved on policing could be diverted to social programs, the group pointed out.

In it's petition BLM makes clear its intention. "We call for a national defunding of police.  We demand investment in our communities and the resources to ensure Black people not only survive but thrive..." 

BLM already has lined up signatures of many Hollywood elites and big name athletes to bolster its campaign.  The effort is beginning to attract champions, including legislators in New York state and the mayor of Los Angeles.  In total, 14 lawmakers in states and cities have signaled support.

LA Mayor Eric Garcetti, who just weeks ago was pushing for raises and bonuses for police officers, is backtracking.  The mayor now supports cuts of up to $150 million in the budget for the LA police. New York legislators are calling on New York City, in particular, to shave police funding.

The issue already has gained the attention of Congress.  Today House Speaker Nancy Pelosi unveiled far reaching legislation to overhaul policing in the U.S.  The speaker said the bill, dubbed the "Justice in Policing Act" was in reaction to the "martyrdom of George Floyd" and "police brutality."

In this rush toward symbolism, politicians have ignored the facts about policing and race.  Although the final 2019 data from the FBI is not available, The Washington Post has maintained a generally recognized accurate account of people shot by police, dating back to 2015.

According to the Post, the data shows the fewest number of people were shot and killed by police in 2018 since it began collecting the numbers.  There were 995 people killed, which is about 0.01% of the contacts and arrests police had with Americans of all colors.

The figures show 403 white people were shot and killed; 210 African-Americans; 148 Hispanics,; 38 were classified as "other;" and, 199 were listed as "unknown."  Of the 995, some 47 victims were unarmed: 23 were white; 17 were black; 5 were Hispanic; and, two were "unknown."

The 2018 FBI data recounted there were 10.2 million police arrests.  That means that the 47 unarmed victims police killed equated to 0.00047% of those arrested.  These does not excuse any unjustified shooting, but offers perspective on how frequently killings occur.

While police shootings trigger headlines, less attention is accorded by the national media to the number of police officers killed in the line of duty.  A total of 56 policemen were killed in 2018, according to FBI data.

Not one American I know or have read about in news reports has tried to justify the actions of the policemen involved in Floyd's arrest and murder.  What they did is evil and a blight on police forces across the country.  But dismantling police departments is an emotional response not based on facts.

Monday, July 30, 2018

Why Soros Is Buying District Attorneys

Elections for local district attorneys were once political yawners.  The contests were uninteresting,  void of partisan politics and starved for big money donors.  All that has changed in recent years as billionaire George Soros has emptied his coffers to tip the scales for liberal Democrat candidates.

Beginning in 2014, the hedge fund kingpin has poured tens of millions of dollars into races for county district attorney across the nation.  His goal is to remove pro-law enforcement, anti-illegal immigration and anti-sanctuary city DA incumbents and replace them with handpicked ideologues.

Soros launched his campaign four years ago with a $50 million donation from his Open Society Foundation to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).  To gain more political leverage, he shoveled millions into political action committees (PAC) targeting law-and-order district attorneys.

Why are county district attorneys so important to Soros?  DA's have wide discretion to decide which crimes to prosecute, what charges to file, who to prosecute and whether to permit plea agreements.  They have the power to accept or reject police evidence in recommendations for prosecution.

With that much authority, district attorneys have the opportunity to reshape the criminal justice system to fit Soros' progressive model. 

The mogul and ally ACLU favor candidates who support open borders, amnesty for illegal immigrants, a moratorium on the death penalty and reduced sentences for so-called low level offenses, such as drug crimes.  However, his candidates rarely mention these issues.

Soros' wealth has found its way into races in Philadelphia, San Diego, Los Angeles, Chicago, Orlando, Houston, several Florida counties, Mississippi and San Antonio.  Political action committees and shadow groups are showered with cash, usually at least $1 million per contest.

Until Soros waded into these arcane races, most voters could not even name their local district attorney.  A contested battle for the position usually attracted little interest and far less than $1 million in donations.  That was before Soros began using his finances and political clout to tilt the equation.

His modus operandi is to employ powerful Washington-based law firm Perkins Cole to establish a PAC with a name that is politically sanitized.  The PACs are branded "Justice and Safety," "California Justice" and "Public Safety."  The names are deliberately obtuse to hide Soros' real agenda.

Soros funding flows through his foundation and some of the 100 organizations with ties to the magnate.  The carpetbagger prefers to remain in the background, the puppet master hidden behind the veiled curtain of secrecy. He never publicly endorses a candidate for district attorney. 

Rather the tycoon orchestrates an infusion of cash for his chosen candidate, swamping war chests raised by opponents.  The money allows the challenger to dominate the air waves with ads smearing the incumbent.  Opponents are caught off guard when they discover Soros is financing the attacks.

Consider what happened to incumbent Bexar County District Attorney Nico LaHood in his reelection campaign this spring.  Soros blindsided LaHood, investing nearly $1 million in Joe Gonzales to oust the incumbent for the sin of opposing San Antonio's sanctuary city status.  LaHood was trounced.

The campaign playbook calls for recruitment of anti-law enforcement organizations such as Black Lives Matter and pro-immigration groups to join forces with the ACLU in stirring up activists in the community.  The result creates the appearance of large scale opposition to the office holder.

A few incumbents are fed up with Soros' meddling.  In the race for DA in San Diego, the incumbent struck back slamming Soros on the airwaves.  In the ads, a picture of Soros is superimposed over masked, black-clad street demonstrator.  The inference is clear: Soros is a threat to public safety.

Despite the push back, Soros has racked up many successes, toppling incumbent district attorneys around the nation.  His funding is creating a national liberal agenda on criminal justice by buying one county district attorney at a time.  There is only one way to stop Soros.  Voters are the best defense.

Don't ignore your local district attorney race.  Research the positions of the candidates.  Use online sources to find out which PAC's are involved in the race.  Learn if the organizations have links to Soros.  Then decide whether you want an independent DA or one beholden to George Soros.

Monday, July 16, 2018

The Supremes: Court Nominees Endure Inquisition

When President George Washington named John Jay as the first chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, he could never have imagined the gauntlet future nominees would face.  Almost 230 years later, court appointees endure fierce partisan attacks and personal vilification.

Once presidential nominees to the nation's highest court were treated with polite deference.  Those days disappeared during the presidency of Richard Nixon when two appointees were rejected in votes by the Senate in 1969 and 1970.  That had not happened since 1930 under President Hoover.

While some nominees have voluntarily withdrawn their names in the past, only a dozen nominees in two centuries have been voted down by the Senate.  While scrutiny of any Supreme Court appointment is part of the Senate's role, it has evolved into political theater unfitting of the office.

As evidence, the retirement of Justice Anthony Kennedy touched off a firestorm of opposition before his replacement was even named. When President Trump tapped Brett Kavanaugh, a respected judge on the Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, the verbal knifing began.

It is an omen that his confirmation hearings will feature political teeth gnashing instead of serious judicial inquiry.

A powerful Political Action Committee (PAC) funded by George Soros has already begun digging into Kavanaugh's background. The American Bridge 21st Century, founded in 2012, specializes in opposition research, a polite term for trolling for dirt on those the PAC deems its enemies.

In fact, the group has made no pretense that it is less interested in combing through Judge Kavanaugh's legal scholarship than it is in uncovering details of his personal life or views on political and religious issues.  The latter may garner the spotlight since the nominee is a practicing Catholic.

The nation was treated to a precursor of what Kavanaugh likely will encounter when President Trump nominated Notre Dame University professor Amy Coney Barrett to an appeals court.  Led by California's Senator Dianne Feinstein, the hearings denigrated into a religious inquisition.

The senator delved deeply into how Barrett's faith might influence her rulings, suggesting she wore her Catholicism too "loudly."  This represented the worst kind of intolerance and bigotry.  Expect more of the same when Kavanaugh is grilled by Democrats during the confirmation hearings.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer has already signaled that "women's health care" will be a central issue.  His choice of words is political code for abortion.  Democrats will hammer that theme to raise the specter that Roe vs. Wade will be overturned if a Catholic justice is confirmed.

(Note to Liberals: A 2017 Pew Research poll of adults nationwide found 57 percent support abortion in all or most cases.  Among Catholics surveyed, 53 percent held the same position.  That means Catholics or no more likely to oppose abortion than any other adult.)

This red herring survives despite the fact there has never been a direct legal challenge to the 1973 Supreme Court decision that ruled unconstitutional a state law banning abortion to save the life of a mother. The ruling has stood for 45 years. In the interim, there have been 60 million U.S. abortions.

The other issue likely to be front and center is the #MeToo movement.  In today's hyper-charged atmosphere any whiff of sexual impropriety is enough to destroy a public figure.  A left-wing outfit Ultraviolet has made its mission to sabotage the nomination with scurrilous sexual accusations.

Ultraviolet is shopping a six-page memo to senators and the media insinuating Kavanaugh knew about sexual harassment accusations against a federal judge and failed to act.  The sleazy dossier offers no incriminating evidence to back its claims against Kavanaugh, who clerked for the judge.

It matters little the alleged incident happened 25 years ago and there has never been a hint of impropriety on Kavanaugh's part.  It also is no coincidence that Ultraviolet has links to MoveOn.org, another activist group that enjoys generous financial support from the irascible Soros. 

Over the next month,  expect activists armed with war chests to nitpick every email, memo and private utterance of Judge Kavanaugh to find a smoking gun. The ruthless efforts will yield no real proof but insidious innuendos.  Thus the hearings likely will be uncivil and uninformative.

Kavanaugh has a 12-year record on the court of appeals.  There are more than 300 of his cases that provide a window into his views on the Constitution as well as insights into his integrity, knowledge of the law and judicial competence.  His judicial record should determine his fate, but it won't.

This is Washington and nothing inspires political grandstanding and personal bullying like hearings for a Supreme Court nominee. Ultimately, Kavanaugh will be approved but not until senators have shredded every last remnant of their already tattered cloak of dignity. 

Monday, May 15, 2017

America's Political Puppet Master

His ranks one of the world's richest people.  He spreads money around like manure in American political campaigns. He backs social causes ranging from legalization of marijuana to open borders and euthanasia. He views himself as a messianic figure who wants to reshape America in his image.

The mystery multi-billionaire is George Soros, born 86-years ago in Budapest, Hungary.  He immigrated to the U.S. in 1956 and has amassed a personal fortune estimated this year to have eclipsed $25 billion.  He heads up a large hedge fund and has an unsavory business reputation.

He made his fortune by shorting the British currency in 1992, earning him the title of the Man Who Broke the Bank of England.  In 1997, Soros was called a "villain" by the Malaysian prime minister after he nearly destroyed the nation's economy through currency manipulation.

His financial entanglements usually end up damaging others.  An activist in Thailand once labelled Soros a "kind of Dracula.  He sucks the blood from people."  He was convicted of insider trading in France and was fined $2.9 million by his native Hungary for illegal market manipulation.

This month an Israeli resources company filed a $10 billion lawsuit against Soros in New York Federal Court, accusing him of meddling in politics in the West African country of Guinea in order to prevent the firm from obtaining a lucrative contract.

This is the man who now pulls the strings in the Democratic Party.  He funneled $21 million to Democrat candidates during the 2016 election cycle, according to OpenSecrets, a non-profit that tracks political donations.  Over the years, he has spent close to $100 million to support Democrats.

He also is among the top bundlers, rich fund raisers who solicit donations from their pals and collect the money for the candidate.  In the period from 1990 to 2016, he bundled $28 million in campaign contributions for the coffers of Democrat candidates, calculates Open.Secrets.

In 2008, Soros forked over a stunning $5 billion to the Democratic National Committee.  A man can buy a lot of influence with dollar signs that add up to billions.  It was no coincidence that 2008 was the year that Barrack Obama won the Democratic nomination, upsetting favored Hillary Clinton.

His political largess extends to 187 organizations in the country that support liberal causes, giving him enormous power and leverage.  He has plowed millions into groups such as Media Matters for America, an organization that aims to silence Fox News and conservative radio talk radio.

Soros has pored millions more into Moveon.org, which has been at the forefront of organizing protests against then-candidate and now President Trump.  The recent Women's March in Washington had ties to at least 50 organizations that are financially connected to Soros.

He prefers to operate out of public view, using his financial muscle and the web of philanthropic and liberal groups he supports to do his bidding.  No Democrat could raise sufficient funding for a national campaign without the political and financial backing of the Godfather, George Soros.

But Soros has ambitions that extend beyond controlling the Democrat Party. He has branched out into media, building a large share holding in Time Warner, which owns CNN.  Soros also has direct ties to 30 mainstream media organizations, reports Media Research Center.

High-level executives from The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN, ABC and the Associated Press serve on Soros-funded organizations, the Media Research Center has documented. Soros wants increased clout with news outlets that peddle propaganda to Americans.

The man's power and influence are unparalleled. It begs the question: Should any one American be allowed to monopolize America's political landscape?  The country's founders would have shouted "absolutely not."  Now Americans must decide if that want one-man rule.